Skip to main content
The Daily Canberra

All of Canberra, every day

News

Canberra Renters Say Duplicate Listing Photos Are Costing Them Time, Money and Trust

Community members across Gungahlin and Belconnen say recycled property images are making an already brutal rental market harder to navigate.

Share

By Canberra News Desk · Published 5 July 2026, 5:12 am

4 min read

Updated 3 h ago· 5 July 2026, 1:12 pm

How we reported this

This article was generated by AI from the linked public sources. The Daily Canberra is independently owned and covers Canberra news free from advertiser or sponsor influence. Read our editorial standards →

Canberra Renters Say Duplicate Listing Photos Are Costing Them Time, Money and Trust
Photo: Photo by Mark Direen on Pexels

Prospective tenants in Canberra are describing a growing frustration with duplicate and misrepresentative images appearing across rental listings — photographs recycled from older listings, different properties, or stock libraries that bear little resemblance to what they find at inspections. The problem is pushing already time-poor public servants and students to waste leave, petrol and application fees chasing properties that look nothing like their advertised photos.

The issue has sharpened in recent months as Canberra's rental vacancy rate has remained among the lowest of any Australian capital. With competition for three-bedroom homes in suburbs like Amaroo and Ngunnawal running at dozens of applications per listing, renters say they cannot afford to waste a single inspection on a property marketed with misleading imagery.

What Renters Are Actually Encountering

Community members posting in the Canberra Renters Support Network — a Facebook group with more than 14,000 members — describe arriving at inspections in Belconnen or Mitchell to find interiors that clearly do not match the listing photographs. Common complaints include images showing freshly painted walls and new carpet in properties that are visibly worn, floor plans that appear to be from a different unit in the same complex, and hero shots taken with wide-angle lenses that make rooms appear significantly larger than they are.

One Gungahlin resident, who has been searching for a two-bedroom rental since April 2026, described spending a Saturday morning driving between four inspections on Mirrabei Drive and around the Holt area, only to find that two of the properties had interiors that did not resemble their online listings. That represents roughly $40 in fuel and half a day of personal leave for a public servant already stretched by cost-of-living pressures.

Students at the Australian National University on Acton Peninsula face a compounding version of the same problem. Many are searching remotely from interstate before the July semester intake, relying entirely on listing photos to shortlist properties near bus routes into Civic. When images turn out to be duplicated from earlier leases — sometimes years old — students arrive in Canberra to inspections they booked sight-unseen and find conditions well below expectations.

What the Rules Say, and Where the Gaps Are

Property listings in the ACT fall under the jurisdiction of Access Canberra, which administers real estate licensing and handles complaints about agent conduct under ACT tenancy legislation. The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, known as ACAT, is the avenue for formal disputes once a lease is signed — but the problem of misleading pre-lease imagery largely falls into a gap: there is no specific requirement under current ACT law mandating that listing photographs accurately represent the current condition of a property at the time of advertising.

The ACT Tenants' Union, based on Alinga Street in Civic, has previously flagged concerns about transparency in rental advertising, though the specific issue of duplicate or recycled imagery has not yet been the subject of a formal regulatory review in the territory. Consumer protection provisions under Australian Consumer Law could theoretically apply to materially misleading images, but enforcement actions in the rental property context are rare.

For context, CoreLogic data published in June 2026 placed Canberra's median weekly rent for a two-bedroom unit at approximately $550, one of the higher figures among non-Sydney capitals. At that price point, applicants paying a $50 credit-check fee per application — a common charge through platforms like 1Form — are absorbing real costs when listings turn out to be misrepresented.

Community members who have experienced the problem advise others to request a video walkthrough directly from the managing agent before attending an inspection, to cross-reference listing photos against the property's previous listings on Domain or realestate.com.au using the address search function, and to report concerns to Access Canberra on 13 22 81 even where no lease has been signed. The ACT Tenants' Union also offers a free advice line for renters trying to assess whether they have grounds for a formal complaint. Until the ACT government moves to close the legislative gap, those workarounds remain the only practical tools renters have.

You might also like

Editorial picks

How did this story land?

Spread the word

Share

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Canberra

Covering news in Canberra. This article was generated by AI from the linked sources and was not reviewed by a human editor before publishing. See our editorial standards.

Spread the word

Share

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Canberra news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Canberra and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Daily Network — local news across Australia