Skip to main content
The Daily Canberra

All of Canberra, every day

News

Canberra Renters and Buyers Speak Out as Duplicate Property Images Muddy an Already Brutal Market

Community members across Gungahlin, Belconnen and the inner south say recycled and mismatched listing photos are costing them time, money and trust in an already stretched housing search.

Share

By Canberra News Desk · Published 5 July 2026, 4:58 am

4 min read

Updated 4 h ago· 5 July 2026, 12:44 pm

How we reported this

This article was generated by AI from the linked public sources. The Daily Canberra is independently owned and covers Canberra news free from advertiser or sponsor influence. Read our editorial standards →

House hunters in Canberra are reporting a growing problem with duplicate and mismatched images appearing across real estate listing platforms — old photos, floor plans from demolished configurations, or pictures lifted from similar properties listed elsewhere — and community members say the issue is making an already punishing property market even harder to navigate.

The problem has surfaced repeatedly in Facebook groups and community forums tied to Gungahlin and Belconnen, two of the territory's fastest-growing suburban corridors, where new apartment blocks and townhouse developments turn over listings quickly and photos from one unit frequently appear on listings for an entirely different one. For renters already struggling with asking prices that ACT Rental Bonds data shows have climbed sharply over the past three years — median weekly rents for two-bedroom units in the ACT reached around $580 in late 2025 according to Domain's quarterly reports — a wasted inspection trip carries a real cost.

What Residents Are Saying

The Belconnen Community Service on Coulter Drive has fielded housing-related inquiries from residents who describe booking inspections based on listing photos only to arrive at properties that look nothing like advertised. Community workers there say the disconnect between images and reality is a recurring complaint, particularly from renters who have driven across town or taken time off work. One resident of the Franklin estate in Gungahlin — who asked not to be identified by name — described turning up to a ground-floor apartment that had been advertised with images clearly showing a balcony view from a high floor, adding that she lodged a complaint with the ACT's Access Canberra portal but received only a form acknowledgment.

The Canberra Renters Coalition, which operates out of the Ainslie Arts Centre on Corinna Street in Phillip, has been tracking the issue informally since early 2026. The group's position is that duplicate image use sits in a grey area under the Australian Consumer Law, which prohibits misleading representations in trade but leaves enforcement of property advertising standards largely to state and territory fair trading bodies. In the ACT, that falls to Access Canberra, part of the Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate.

The issue is not exclusive to rentals. Buyers attending open homes in suburbs like Casey and Moncrieff — both within the Gungahlin district and among the territory's highest-growth postcodes — have described similar mismatches on platforms including realestate.com.au and Domain. An apartment listed with polished renders or images from a display suite rather than the actual unit for sale is a well-documented practice in new developments, though disclosure requirements differ depending on whether the property is off-the-plan or already completed.

What Protections Exist — and Where the Gaps Are

The Real Estate Institute of the ACT's Code of Conduct requires member agents to avoid conduct that is deceptive or misleading, including in advertising materials. However, the code is enforced through a complaints process that typically takes weeks, by which point a rental listing has usually been filled or a property sold. Community advocates argue that the timeline makes the mechanism largely ineffective for preventing harm rather than simply recording it after the fact.

ANU's Urban and Regional Planning program, based on the Acton campus, has in recent semesters examined digital property marketing practices as part of broader housing affordability research. While no published findings from that specific line of work were available at the time of writing, students involved in one 2025 studio project noted in their publicly available project brief that data integrity in online listings was a recognised gap in tenant protections nationally.

For Canberrans currently searching for housing, advocates from the Tenants' Union ACT — based on Lonsdale Street in Braddon — recommend photographing everything at inspection, requesting written confirmation of any discrepancy between listing images and the actual property before signing a lease, and filing a formal complaint through Access Canberra's online portal if an agent refuses to address the mismatch. Complaints can also be escalated to the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, though the process requires applicants to have standing, usually meaning they have already entered into an agreement. Prevention, in other words, still depends largely on the vigilance of the person with the least power in the transaction.

You might also like

Editorial picks

How did this story land?

Spread the word

Share

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Canberra

Covering news in Canberra. This article was generated by AI from the linked sources and was not reviewed by a human editor before publishing. See our editorial standards.

Spread the word

Share

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Canberra news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Canberra and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Daily Network — local news across Australia