Skip to main content
The Daily Canberra

All of Canberra, every day

News

Canberra Renters and Buyers Say Duplicate Property Listings Are Costing Them Time, Money and Trust

Community members across Gungahlin, Belconnen and inner Canberra describe a frustrating and sometimes costly experience with the same properties appearing multiple times across major real estate platforms.

Share

By Canberra News Desk · Published 5 July 2026, 5:16 am

4 min read

Updated 3 h ago· 5 July 2026, 1:22 pm

How we reported this

This article was generated by AI from the linked public sources. The Daily Canberra is independently owned and covers Canberra news free from advertiser or sponsor influence. Read our editorial standards →

Canberra Renters and Buyers Say Duplicate Property Listings Are Costing Them Time, Money and Trust
Photo: Photo by Cesar G on Pexels

House hunters across Canberra are raising concerns about duplicate property listings on major real estate websites, with residents from Gungahlin to Woden describing how repeated images and near-identical advertisements are distorting their search for homes in an already punishing market.

The issue has come into sharper focus in mid-2026 as housing affordability in the ACT continues to squeeze public servants and renters alike. Median house prices in Canberra have remained among the highest in the country relative to local incomes, and anyone wasting hours chasing phantom listings is losing time they cannot easily recover. In a city where the rental vacancy rate has hovered below two percent for extended stretches, a duplicated listing can mean a family drives across town to inspect a property already leased — or worse, submits a formal application for one that does not exist as advertised.

Community members who spoke to The Daily Canberra — contacted through the Gungahlin Community Facebook Group and the Belconnen Community Centre's housing assistance network — described a consistent pattern. A property on Hibberson Street in Gungahlin's town centre might appear under two different agency names, with slightly altered descriptions but identical photographs. The same two-bedroom unit in Chifley shows up on both Domain and realestate.com.au with different listed prices and different contact numbers, both of which ring through to the same managing agent. For renters already stretched thin, the confusion is not trivial.

What Residents Are Experiencing on the Ground

One Belconnen renter — who did not wish to be named but confirmed she works for a federal government department in Barton — said she spent three weekends in May inspecting properties that turned out to be duplicates of homes she had already visited or already been knocked back on. She described the experience as demoralising and said she had lodged a complaint with the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, though she was still waiting on a response as of early July.

The ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, which handles residential tenancy disputes in the territory, received a record number of lodgements in the 2024–25 financial year, according to figures published in its annual report. Property advertisement complaints represent a smaller slice of that caseload, but advocates at the Tenants' Union ACT — based on Girrahween Street in Braddon — say they are fielding more calls about misleading listings than at any previous point in the organisation's operation.

The problem is partly structural. Real estate platforms allow agents to syndicate listings across multiple portals automatically, and if an agent uploads the same property twice — under different reference numbers, different price brackets, or through separate franchise arms — the duplicate can persist for weeks before either the platform or the agent catches it. No federal regulation currently requires real estate platforms to deduplicate listings before publication. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has issued general guidance on misleading advertising in property markets, but enforcement specific to duplicate digital listings has been limited.

What Comes Next for Canberra House Hunters

Advocates at the Tenants' Union ACT recommend that prospective renters screenshot every listing they engage with, noting the exact URL, the listed price, and the date of first contact with an agent. That paper trail is essential if a formal complaint is lodged. For buyers, the Real Estate Institute of the ACT — which has offices near the CBD on Hobart Place — advises cross-referencing any listing against the property's official title records through Access Canberra before committing to an inspection or making an offer.

Consumer Affairs ACT confirmed in a statement on its website that it accepts complaints about misleading property advertising and can refer matters to the ACCC where conduct appears to breach the Australian Consumer Law. The process can take months. For renters in Gungahlin or Belconnen who need a roof over their heads now, that timeline offers limited comfort. The practical advice from housing advocates is blunt: treat any listing you cannot independently verify through a title search or a confirmed agent name as unconfirmed until you are standing at the door.

You might also like

Editorial picks

How did this story land?

Spread the word

Share

Have your say

Loading comments…

Sources

About this article

Published by The Daily Canberra

Covering news in Canberra. This article was generated by AI from the linked sources and was not reviewed by a human editor before publishing. See our editorial standards.

Spread the word

Share

See something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Daily brief

Enjoyed this? Wake up to Canberra news every morning.

Free, in your inbox before 7am. Weekdays.

By subscribing you agree to receive emails from The Daily Canberra and accept our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

The Daily Network — local news across Australia